Hebrews studies series
Hebrews 5:1-14
Aaron, Jesus, and Me
HEBREWS STUDY #9
s
Do you ever have trouble understanding a
certain book of the Bible? Which book is
hardest for you to understand?
s
Why are some books harder to understand
than others?
s
Are there blessings attached with the study
of a passage hard to understand?
s
Are there ever problems within us that keep
us from understanding the truths of God’s Word?
One of the key things that we saw in our study last week was
that Jesus is our great High Priest.
This week we will make a comparison of Aaron and Jesus as High Priests.
Then we will look for a few minutes at why this passage and ones to follow
might be hard for us to understand. We
will be taking a look at ourselves. Hence, the title “Aaron,
Jesus, and Me”.
Please note that when we talk about Aaron as high priest, we are
referring to him, and those members of his family that succeeded him in the
Priesthood.
1. HE MINISTERED AS A MAN
FOR MAN TO GOD – Vs. 1
Ø Why was the High Priest a man and not an angel or some other
heavenly being?
Ø Notice that the High Priest ministers for man. His job was one of service. How are we, as Christians, to be of service
to other Christians? How are we, as
Christians, to be of service to unbelievers?
Ø The High Priest offered sacrifices for sin, not only on the Day
of Atonement, when he went into the “Holy of Holies”, but all year.
Ø The High Priest was coming to God in behalf of men. How do Christians do the same?
See 1 Timothy 2:1 and James 5:16.
2. HE HAD COMPASSION
BECAUSE HE COULD IDENTIFY WITH HIS
FELLOW MAN – Vs. 2
Ø God’s High Priest was to have compassion or to “deal gently”
with people.
Ø “It refers to the middle course between apathy and anger. A true
high priest is not indifferent to moral lapses; neither is he harsh.” Frank E. Gabelein, Editor, The
Expositor’s Bible Commentary ,Volume 12, (
Ø In viewing and dealing with the sins of others, how is it
possible to be neither apathetic nor condemning? Consider the quality of the High Priest
mentioned in this verse.
3.
HE HAD TO OFFER SACRIFICES FOR HIS OWN SINS AS WELL AS
THE SINS OF OTHERS –
Vs. 3
Ø The High Priest, being human and a sinner, had to offer
sacrifices for his own sins.
Ø As God’s priests today, how do we deal with our sins before
praying for others? 1John 1:9
4. HE WAS CALLED OF GOD –
Vs. 4
Ø Aaron and his descendents were the High Priests and priests in
1. HE MINISTERS
AS A MAN, THE SON OF GOD, FOR MAN TO GOD – Vs. 5
ü
Acts 13:33-34 shows that Psalms
2:7, quoted here, refers to the resurrection.
Jesus, as a resurrected man sits at the right hand of the Son of God as
our High Priest.
2. HE WAS
CALLED OF GOD – Vss. 6, 10
ü
God chose Jesus
to be a priest, but there is a problem. What Tribe was Jesus from? What was Aaron from? Which tribe was the tribe of the priests?
ü
The solution to
the problem is really quite simple. Jesus was a priest of a different order,
the Order of Melchizedek. Psalm 110:4
ü
Who was
Melchizedek? Genesis 14:18-20
ü
Melchizedek was also a king, King of
Salem. What town was
ü
Jesus is also a
king. “King of Kings” and “Lord of Lords”. From where will He reign?
3. HE HAS
COMPASSION BECAUSE HE CAN IDENTIFY WITH HIS
FELLOW MEN
– Vss. 7-8
ü
To what is verse
7 probably referring? How did this event
prepare him to be a sympathetic High Priest?
ü
Why did Jesus
need to learn obedience?
4. HE OFFERED
SACRIFICE FOR SIN ONCE AND FOR ALL – Vs. 9
ü
How was Jesus’
sacrifice different from the ones Aaron offered?
The Hebrews were being
confronted with some pretty deep theological discussion here. And the author of Hebrews had even more to
say about the priesthood under Melchizedek.
He stops to give an admonition.
We need to ask if what is said here applies to us.
1. IS THERE
DULLNESS? – Vs. 11
·
The word dullness
means “sluggish” or “lazy.
·
How does this
hurt our understanding of Scripture?
·
How do Christians
get “sluggish” or “lazy” in their devotions and in church?
2. IS THERE DELAY? – Vs. 12
·
Why do Christians
not want to be teachers?
·
Why is this verse
a challenge even if we never teach?
·
What are some
doctrines that are “milk”? What are some
that are “strong meat”?
3. IS THERE A DETRIMENT? – Vs. 13
·
What is the
problem with “milk”? Should it be
eliminated entirely? 2 Peter 1:12-13
4. IS THERE DISCERNMENT? – Vs. 14
·
How does one
develop an appetite for strong meat?
·
What are the advantages
of a diet of strong meat?